|
The use of fractional number and decimal number
Fractional number
The first appearance of fractional numbers (fen shu in Chinese) was
not a result of dividing two numbers. Fractions were considered as being whole
numbers in themselves, and the word fen means to split or divide.
Later, in the process of calculation, fractional numbers also appeared to denote
the ratio of two whole numbers. Systematic fractional number algorithm appeared
in the ancient math classic Jiuzhang Suanshu (Nine Chapters on Mathematical
Art) in the Eastern Han
Dynasty (25-220) around about the 1st century, which was about 1,400 years
earlier than in Europe.
In the annotated version of Jiuzhang Suanshu by Liu Hui, it clearly
shows the algorithm of the subtraction, addition, multiplication, and division
of fractional numbers, which is identical to today's fractional calculations.
Besides, other knowledge about fractions, including how to compare two
fractions, and how to calculate the average of fractions, were also included in
the book, making Jiuzhang Suanshu the earliest monograph that
systematically discussed fractional numbers.
It is generally believed in Europe that the algorithm of fractional numbers
originated in India, while the fact is the earliest Indian book on the algorithm
of fractions appeared in the seventh century, in which introduced the same rules
as the those in Jiuzhang Suanshu. And even the annotated version of
Jiuzhang Suanshu by Liu Hui was completed in 263 in the Wei Dynasty
(220-265), which means that the book is at least 400 years earlier than its
counterpart in India.
Decimal number
Also in the annotated version of Jiuzhang Suanshu by Liu Hui, the
notion of the decimal number was first raised up. Liu invented the decimal
number to denote the approximate number value of root extractions. Around the
year 1300, Liu Jin in the Yuan
Dynasty (1271-1368) wrote the number 106368.6312 as in his book Lvlv Chengshu. The notion of decimal number appeared in the
West in 1585 and the expression is rather difficult. For instance, the same
number mentioned above would be expressed as or 106368 .
Author: Jeff
|
|